| 636 | 16 | 67 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 探讨ICU患者医疗器械相关性压力性损伤(Medical device related pressure injury, MDRPI)的危险因素,构建预测MDRPI的列线图模型。方法 选取2021年6月-2022年2月收治的ICU患者280例,根据是否发生MDRPI分为发生组(n=55)和未发生组(n=225),并根据患者的一般资料、临床资料及医疗器械使用资料进行单因素分析和Logistic回归分析,构建预测MDRPI风险的列线图模型。结果 280例研究对象中有55例发生MDRPI(19.6%)。单因素分析显示,两组患者的年龄、Braden量表评分、急性生理与慢性健康评分(APACHEⅡ评分)、血清白蛋白、血红蛋白、红细胞压积、手术、俯卧位、血管活性药使用、镇静药使用、肠内营养、气管插管使用、鼻胃管使用、无创通气面罩使用时间、器械使用总数差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,年龄、手术、俯卧位、APACHEⅡ评分、无创通气面罩使用时间是MDRPI的独立危险因素;血红蛋白是保护因素(P<0.05)。基于上述影响因素构建ICU患者MDRPI的列线图预测模型,校准度(x2=7.177,P=0.518)和区分度(AUC=0.953,95%CI 0.926~0.979)良好。决策曲线显示,当患者的阈值概率为0~1,使用列线图预测模型预测MDRPI风险的净收益更高。结论 本研究构建的ICU患者MDRPI风险列线图预测模型具有良好的风险识别能力,可以为尽早制定预见性干预策略提供理论指导。
Abstract:Objective To explore the risk factors of medical device related pressure injury in ICU patients and to establish a risk prediction model for predicting the risk of pressure injury.Methods 280 patients in ICU admitted from June 2021 to February 2022 were divided into two groups by the occurrence of MDRPI.According to general data, clinical data and medical device use data, univariate analysis and Logistic regression analysis were carried out to construct a risk prediction model to predict the risk of MDRPI.Results Among the 280 subjects, 55 patients developed MDRPI(19.6%).Univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in age, Braden scale score, APACHEⅡscore, serum albumin, hemoglobin, hematocrit, surgery, prone position, use of vasoactive agents, use of sedatives,enteral nutrition,use of endotracheal intubation,use of nasogastric tube,use of non-invasive ventilation mask and total use of devices between the two groups.Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that age,operation,prone position,Apache II score and duration of non-invasive ventilation mask were independent risk factors for MDRPI,and hemoglobin was a protective factor.Based on the above influencing factors,a nomogram prediction model for the risk of MDRPI in patients with ICU was constructed,and calibration(x2=7.177,P=0.518) and differentiation(AUC=0.953,95% CI 0.926~0.979) were good.The decision curve showed that when the threshold probability of the patient was 0~1,the net benefit of using the nomogram prediction model to predict the risk of MDRPI was higher.Conclusion The MDRPI risk prediction model of ICU patients constructed in this study has a good risk identification ability and can provide theoretical guidance for formulation of predictive intervention strategies as soon as possible.
[1] 杨龙飞,宋冰,倪翠萍,等.2019版《压力性损伤的预防和治疗:临床实践指南》更新解读[J].中国护理管理,2020,20(12):1849-1854.
[2] ERBAY DALLI ?,CEYLAN ■ KELEBEK GIRGIN N.Incidence,characteristics and risk factors of medical device-related pressure injuries:An observational cohort study[J].Intensive Crit Care Nurs,2022,69:103180.
[3] 刘亚红,李婷,付成成,等.ICU医疗器械相关性压疮的原因分析及对策[J].中华现代护理杂志,2014,20(11):1252-1254.
[4] WANG S L,CHUANG P Y,SU W C.Application of care bundles to reduce Medical-Device-Related Pressure Injury (MDRPI) incidence in a coronary care unit[J].Hu Li Za Zhi,2018,65(3):80-87.
[5] LIN F,WU Z,SONG B,et al.The effectiveness of multicomponent pressure injury prevention programs in adult intensive care patients:A systematic review[J].Int J Nurs Stud,2020,102:103483.
[6] 曹子璇,魏亚倩,章晋,等.成人住院患者医疗器械相关性压力性损伤流行特征的Meta分析[J].中国护理管理,2020,20(5):707-716.
[7] YANG G,GAO C,CAI J.Prevention of nasal ala pressure injuries with use of hydroactive dressings in patients with nasotracheal intubation of orthognathic surgery:A randomized controlled trial[J].J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs,2020,47(5):484-488.
[8] KOO M,SIM Y,KANG I.Risk factors of medical device-related pressure ulcer in intensive care units[J].J Korean Acad Nurs,2019,49(1):36-45.
[9] COYER F,COOK J L,DOUBROVSKY A,et al.Exploring medical device-related pressure injuries in a single intensive care setting:A longitudinal point prevalence study[J].Int Crit Care Nurs,2021,68:103155.
[10] DELMORE B A,AYELLO E A.1.5 CE test hours:Pressure injuries caused by medical devices and other objects:A clinical update[J].Am J Nurs,2017,117(12):36-45.
[11] LUSTIG A,MARGI R,ORLOV A,et al.The mechanobiology theory of the development of medical device-related pressure ulcers revealed through a cell-scale computational modeling framework[J].Biomech Model Mech,2021,20(3):851-860.
[12] 王娜,熊尹诗,张颖,等.医疗器械相关压力性损伤的危险因素及集束化管理的研究进展[J].职业与健康,2022,38(1):141-144.
[13] 刘新,陈红,冯鑫.急诊重症监护室成人患者医疗设备相关压力性损伤调查[J].中国护理管理,2019,19(8):1222-1225.
[14] HALEEM S ,MIHAI R,ROTHENFLUH D A,et al.Preventing iatrogenic facial pressure ulcers during spinal surgery:Prospective trial using a novel method and review of literature[J].Int Wound J,2020,17(5):1391-1395.
[15] 张倩倩,郭爱敏,李尊柱.俯卧位通气相关面部压力性损伤影响因素及预防策略[J].护理实践与研究,2022,19(11):1662-1666.
[16] 中华医学会重症医学分会重症呼吸学组.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者俯卧位通气治疗规范化流程[J].中华内科杂志 ,2020,59(10):781-787.
[17] 杨小辉,赵媛媛,钮美娥.ICU医疗器械相关压力性损伤的研究现状[J].护理学报,2017,24(13):49-53.
[18] ZEEVI T,LEVY A,BRAUNER N,et al.Effects of ambient conditions on the risk of pressure injuries in bedridden patients-multi‐physics modelling of microclimate[J].Inter Wound J,2018,15(3):402-416.
[19] 刘恬,陈哲颖,吴晓蓉.受压界面皮肤温度变化与压力性损伤关系的研究进展[J].护理学杂志,2019,34(1):99-102.
[20] SAYAN H E,GIRGIN N K,ASAN A.Prevalence of pressure ulcers in hospitalized adult patients in bursa,turkey:A multicentre,point prevalence study[J].J Eval Clin Pract,2020,26(6):1669-1676.
[21] 申微军,陈琨,丁美祝.慢性阻塞性肺疾病无创正压通气患者面部压疮发生的危险因素分析与风险预测模型的构建及检验[J].护士进修杂志,2019,34(24):2224-2228.
[22] 李进,吴小玲.无创正压通气患者鼻面部压疮危险因素的研究进展[J].重庆医学,2017,46(21):2998-3001.
[23] 文雯,林白浪,陈小芬,等.压力性损伤及风险病人全程营养管理方案研究进展[J].全科护理,2020,18(17):2077-2080.
[24] 姚秀英,耿丽,张理想,等.ICU患者压力性损伤预测风险列线图模型的建立[J].护理学报,2019,26(11):55-59.
[25] 乔彩虹,杨辉,曹慧丽.ICU医疗器械相关性压力性损伤的风险评估及护理干预研究进展[J].护理研究,2021,35(18):3308-3311.
[26] 陈金,王琴,张岚,等.医疗器械相关压力性损伤预防的证据总结[J].中华护理教育,2020,17(3):226-232.
基本信息:
中图分类号:R473
引用信息:
[1]祁进芳,胡宁宁,李振刚,等.ICU患者医疗器械相关性压力性损伤风险预测模型的构建[J].新疆医科大学学报,2022,45(09):1051-1057.
基金信息:
新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(2021D01C455)
2022-09-15
2022-09-15