| 401 | 20 | 44 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的探究养血祛风汤联合耳穴压豆治疗血虚风燥型特应性皮炎临床价值。方法选择桂林市中医医院皮肤科2019年1月-2020年11月收治的98例特应性皮炎患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组与试验组,每组49例。对照组给予常规西医治疗,试验组在对照组基础上给予养血祛风汤+耳穴压豆治疗,两组均治疗4周。对比两组患者临床疗效、安全性及治疗前后病情相关评分(SCORAD)、血清IgE及生活质量评分(DLQI)变化,随访3个月,统计对比两组复发率。结果与对照组比较,试验组患者临床总有效率升高,患者SCORAD评分、DLQI评分和血清IgE水平均降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗期间两组患者血尿常规、肝肾功能均未见明显异常。对两组患者随访3个月,与试验组比较,对照组患者复发率降低,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.166,P=0.041)。结论养血祛风汤联合耳穴压豆治疗血虚风燥型特应性皮炎安全有效,复发率低。
Abstract:Objective To explore the clinical value of Yangxue Qufeng decoction combined with auricular point pressing beans in the treatment of atopic dermatitis of blood deficiency and wind dryness type. Methods A total of 98 patients with atopic dermatitis in Department of Dermatology, Guilin Hospital of traditional Chinese medicine from January 2019 to November 2020 were selected as the research objects and randomly divided into control group and experimental group with 49 cases in each group. The control group was treated with conventional western medicine, while the experimental group was treated with Yangxue Qufeng Decoction + auricular point pressing beans on the basis of the control group. Both groups were treated for 4 weeks. The clinical efficacy, safety and changes of SCORAD, serum IgE and DLQI before and after the treatment were compared between the two groups. The recurrence rates of the two groups were compared after 3 months of follow-up. Results Compared with the control group, the clinical total effective rate of the experimental group was higher, and the SCORAD score, DLQI score and serum IgE level of the patients were lower(P < 0.05). During the treatment, the blood and urine routine, liver and kidney function of the two groups were not significantly abnormal. After 3 months follow-up, compared with the experimental group, the recurrence rate of the control group was lower(χ2=4.166, P=0.041). Conclusion Yangxue Qufeng decoction combined with auricular point pressing beans is safe and effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis of blood deficiency and wind dryness type with low recurrence rate.
[1] KANTOR R,THYSSEN J P,PALLER A S,et al.Atopic dermatitis,atopic eczema, or eczema asystematic review,meta-analysis,and recommendation for uniform use of'atopic dermatitis'[J].Allergy,2016,71(10):1480-1485.
[2]马雁南,孙令,张策,等.中西医结合治疗特应性皮炎的Meta分析[J].医学与哲学,2017,38(22):49-53.
[3]林欢儿,李孜怡,彭静,等.中医药治疗特应性皮炎研究进展[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2019,21(11):29-32.
[4]刘虹,艾志福.血虚风燥型特应性皮炎药膳组方规律研究[J].世界科学技术-中医药现代化,2019,21(6):1245-1250.
[5]张小艳,马睛雅,李学靖,等.基于共词分析的耳穴埋豆中医护理技术研究热点分析[J].上海护理,2019,19(11):37-41.
[6]杨延婷,黄琴峰,贾一凡,等.耳穴贴压法临床应用现状与分析[J].针灸推拿医学(英文版),2016,14(2):141-148.
[7]张学军.皮肤性病学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:111-113.
[8]中华中医药学会皮肤科专业委员会.特应性皮炎中医诊疗方案专家共识[J].中国中西医结合皮肤性病学杂志,2013,12(1):60-61.
[9]林银哲,黄咏菁,莫秀梅,等.特应性皮炎患者中医证型与临床评价指标的关系研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2019, 29(13):119-122.
[10]姚丹霓,卢传坚,何泽慧,等.基于中医临床研究的皮肤病生活质量指数临床最小重要差值研究[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志,2016,30(6):625-628,645.
[11]曹烨,万帮喜.药物临床试验中的安全评价[J].中国新药杂志,2017,26(22):2646-2651.
[12]国家中医药管理局.中医病证诊断疗效标准[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2017:264-265.
[13]李福高,徐承智,虞英民.依巴斯汀临床研究进展[J].中国医药导刊,2015,17(4):371-374.
[14]林银哲,黄咏菁,莫秀梅,等.特应性皮炎患者中医证型与临床评价指标的关系研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2019,29(13):119-122.
[15]李红敏,闵仲生,谭城.血虚风燥型特应性皮炎患者皮损干燥与瘙痒的相关性研究[J].中国中西医结合皮肤性病学杂志,2018,17(1):12-14.
[16]姚星宇,陈力.中药改善特应性皮炎瘙痒的应用经验[J].国际中医中药杂志,2017,39(12):1142-1143.
[17]刘继洪,许艺燕,徐光镇,等.耳穴医疗是中西医结合的一座“桥梁”[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2019,39(6):750-752.
[18]刘志红.耳穴疗法在皮肤病中的应用概况[J].中医药导报,2018,24(12):101-103,109.
[19] KIM B S,SUN K,PAPP K,et al.Effects of ruxolitinib cream on pruritus and quality of life in atopic dermatitis:Results from a phase 2,randomized, dose-ranging, vehicle-and active-controlled study[J].Am Acad Dermatol,2020,82(6):1305-1313.
基本信息:
中图分类号:R275.9
引用信息:
[1]肖杰,赵霞.养血祛风汤联合耳穴压豆治疗血虚风燥型特应性皮炎的临床疗效研究[J].新疆医科大学学报,2021,44(08):963-967.
基金信息:
广西壮族自治区卫生健康委员会科研课题(Z2018319)
2021-08-15
2021-08-15