nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2022, 09, v.45 985-991
无托槽隐形矫治器与钟摆矫治器对骨性Ⅱ类错■畸形矫治的临床对比研究
基金项目(Foundation): 北京市科技计划项目(Z151100004015155)
邮箱(Email): dsy1@sohu.com;
DOI:
发布时间: 2022-09-15
出版时间: 2022-09-15
移动端阅读
摘要:

目的 探讨无托槽隐形矫治器与钟摆矫治器对骨性Ⅱ类错■畸形矫治过程中牙体移动精准控制效果。方法 选取首都医科大学电力教学医院2017年5月至2020年5月接诊的107例骨性Ⅱ类错■畸形患者。根据矫治器类型分为无托槽隐形矫治器组(44例)和钟摆矫治器组(63例),分别佩戴无托槽隐形矫治器和钟摆矫治器进行矫治。对比两组患者的矫治疗程、治疗前后上颌第一磨牙位移距离的差值、治疗前后上颌骨与下颌骨的骨性改变情况,并统计两组患者对矫治效果的满意度。结果 无托槽隐形矫治器组与钟摆矫治器组患者的矫治疗程经比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者上颌第一磨牙(U6)矫治前后患者牙冠与牙根坐标的差值((ΔXg、ΔYg、ΔZg)、(ΔXr、ΔYr、ΔZr)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),上牙槽座点以及鼻根点之间构成的角(SNA)、下牙槽座点以及鼻根点之间构成的角(SNB)、腭平面的倾斜角(SN-PP)、上颌平面角(PP-FH)、下颌第一磨牙(L6)的长轴与MP平面之间的交角(L6-long axis-MP)、PP平面与■平面之间的交角(PP-FOP)、SN平面与■平面的交角(SN-FOP)、后面高(S-Go)、后面高与前面高之比(S-Go/N-Me)的差值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。钟摆矫治器组患者前下面高与前面高比值(LFH/TFH)的差值,UI-SN差值大于无托槽隐形矫治器组,L6近中颊的尖点与MP平面之间垂直距离[L6-MP(LPDH)]的差值大于无托槽隐形矫治器组(P均<0.05)。两组患者对正畸效果的满意度均为100.00%。结论 无托槽隐形矫治器与钟摆矫治器矫治骨性Ⅱ类错■畸形的效果均较好,患者满意度高。相比于钟摆矫治器,无托槽隐形矫治器更好地改善了患者磨牙远移后牙齿垂直方向的变化,且不容易丢失前牙支抗而导致前牙唇倾,对牙体移动精准控制效果更好。

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the comparison betweenbracketless invisible appliance and pendulum appliance inprecise control of tooth movement during the orthodontic treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.Methods 107 patients with skeletal Class Ⅱ malocclusion were selected from the hospital from May 2017 to may 2020.According to the type of appliance,thepatients were divided into non bracket invisible appliance group(44 cases) and pendulum appliance group(63 cases).Compare the treatment course of the patients in two groups of,the difference ofdisplacement distance ofmaxillary first molar before and after the treatment,the bone changes ofmaxilla and the mandible before and after the treatment,and count the satisfaction of the two groups of the patients with the treatment effect.Results There was no significant difference in the treatment course between the invisible appliance group without bracket and the pendulum appliance group(P>0.05).There was no significant difference between(ΔXg、ΔYg、ΔZg) 、(ΔXr、ΔYr、ΔZr) inthetwogroups(P>0.05),and there was no significant difference between SNA,SNB,SN-PP,PP-FH,L6 long axis MP,PP FOP,SN-FOP,S-GO,S-GO/N-Me(P>0.05).The difference of LFH/TFH was less than that in non bracket invisible appliance group,and the difference of L6-MP(LPDH) was greater than that in non bracket invisible appliance group(all P<0.05).The satisfaction of the patients in both groups with orthodontic effect was 100.00%.Conclusion The effect of non bracket invisible appliance and pendulum appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion is better,and thesatisfaction ofthe patient is high.Compared with the pendulum appliance,the invisible appliance without bracket can better improve the change ofvertical direction ofteeth after the molar is moved far,and it is not easy to lose the anterior anchorage and lead tolip inclination of the anterior teeth,which has a better effect onaccuratingthe control of tooth movement.

参考文献

[1] GEORGE A M,FELICITA A S,MILLING-TANIA S D,et al.Systematic review on the genetic factors associated with skeletal class II malocclusion[J].Indian J Dent Res,2021,32(3):399-406.

[2] FICHERA G,RONSIVALLE V,SANTONOCITO S,et al.Class II skeletal malocclusion and prevalence of temporomandibular disorders.An epidemiological pilot sStudy on growing subjects[J].J Funct Morphol Kinesiol,2021,6(3):63-72.

[3] ZHANG X,YI J,LI Y.Effects of nutrition and hormones on functional appliance treatment outcome in patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion[J].J World Fed Orthod,2020,9(1):9-12.

[4] 赵长铭,徐璐璐.Twin-block功能矫治器在安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形矫治的临床研究进展[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2019,10(9):3-7.

[5] JADHAV P J,SONAWANE S V,MAHAJAN N,et al.Nonextraction correction of class II malocclusion by pendulum appliance[J].J Pharm Bioallied Sci,2021,13(Suppl 2):S1750-S1754.

[6] SERAFIN M,FASTUCA R,CASTELLANI E,et al.Occlusal plane changes after molar distalization with a pendulum appliance in growing patients with class II malocclusion:A retrospective cephalometric study[J].Turk J Orthod,2021,34(1):10-17.

[7] 孟雪欢,王春娟,王超,等.无托槽隐形矫治整体内收减数正畸患者前牙的三维有限元分析[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2019,54(11):753-759.

[8] 高尚,吴珊珊,周珊,等.无托槽隐形矫治器影响扭转牙矫治效能的相关因素分析[J].哈尔滨医科大学学报,2021,55(2):4-8.

[9] 周力,王艳民,张澜,等.隐形功能矫治器矫治青少年Ⅱ类错牙合畸形[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2019,37(3):236-241.

[10] 李亚红,刘会玲,李丰.某地区应征青年错颌畸形发生情况调查与分析[J].人民军医,2020,63(5):2-6.

[11] 周星宇,贾莹,李仲伟,等.三维成像技术评估骨性Ⅱ类错牙合不同垂直骨面型的牙轴倾斜特征[J].中国组织工程研究,2022,26(17):6-10.

[12] 牛树强,侯凤春,张倩倩,等.Twin-block矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类骨性错牙合后的软、硬组织变化[J].上海口腔医学,2021,30(1):4-8.

[13] 王庆昱,向彪,吴刚,等.无托槽隐形矫治器在成人中重度拥挤拔牙病例中的临床应用分析[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2020,36(8):5.

[14] GHAFFAR F,JAN A,AKHTAR O,et al.Comparative analysis of dentoskeletal changes of the twin block appliance and the advansync2 appliance in treatment of skeletal class-II malocclusion in pakistani population:A randomized clinical trial[J].Eur J Dent,2021,15(1):74-89.

[15] 余智爽,邓怡.无托槽隐形矫治器关闭邻面去釉间隙的生物力学研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2020,36(5):4-7.

[16] 昝琳.不同功能矫治器矫治骨性Ⅱ类错牙合的临床疗效对比[J].中国社区医师,2018,34(8):2-5.

[17] 石敏,王红,张静,等.无托槽隐形矫治器与直丝弓矫治器治疗牙周炎伴错牙合畸形的疗效比较[J].河北医学,2020,26(2):5-10.

[18] 李江,黄诗言,李鑫,等.无托槽隐形矫治与固定矫治对患者口腔健康状况的影响[J].北京口腔医学,2021,29(3):4-8.

[19] 李安然,沙海亮,封平平,等.改良型反向Twin-block矫治器治疗替牙期安氏Ⅲ类错牙合一例[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,2021,28(2):105-107.

[20] 刘昕,刘浩.无托槽隐形矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形11例[J].安徽医药,2021,25(5):5-10.

基本信息:

中图分类号:R783.5

引用信息:

[1]高雪,张栋梁,尹伟娇,等.无托槽隐形矫治器与钟摆矫治器对骨性Ⅱ类错■畸形矫治的临床对比研究[J].新疆医科大学学报,2022,45(09):985-991.

基金信息:

北京市科技计划项目(Z151100004015155)

发布时间:

2022-09-15

出版时间:

2022-09-15

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文